Domestic Relations Review
COURT OF APPEALS DID NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION TO ISSUE SUPERINTENDING CONTROL
Lapeer County Clerk v. Lapeer Circuit Judges, _____Mich____(2002) (Nos. 118091 and 118102, March 12, 2002)
CONSENT JUDGMENT FOR SUPPORT OF MINOR UNDER FORMER MCL 722.713 WAS MODIFIABLE BECAUSE COURT HAD DETERMINED DEFENDANT, WHO ACKNOWLEDGED PATERNITY, WAS THE FATHER
Macomb County Department of Social Services ex rel Roberts v. Westerman, ____Mich App ____(2002) (Court of Appeals No. 223563, March 8, 2002)
FATHER'S PAYMENT ON SUPPORT ARREARAGE THROUGH INCOME WITHHOLDING ORDER AFTER STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS RAN CONSTITUTED WAIVER OF LIMITATIONS DEFENSE
Hart v. Hart, UNPUBLISHED (Court of Appeals No. 228899, March 5, 2002)
TRIAL COURT HAD AUTHORITY TO ENTER PPO PROHIBITING DEFENDANT FROM CONTACTING HIS CHILDREN AND COULD MODIFY THE PPO TO INCLUDE PARENTING TIME
Brandt v. Brandt, ____Mich App____ (2002) (Court of Appeals Nos. 225375 & 230952, February 19, 2002)
MICHIGAN GRANDPARENT VISITATION STATUTE DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONALTop of Page
DeRose v. DeRose, ____Mich App ____(2002) (Court of Appeals No. 232780, January 25, 2002)ETHICS OPINION SPECIFIES LIMITS ON PRACTICE OF PART-TIME FAMILY COURT REFEREES
Ethics Opinion JI-126
Return to Calhoun County Courts Home Page
Last updated 6-2-03
Send your comments, questions and suggestions to Phil Harter at 161
E Michigan Avenue, Battle Creek, Michigan 49014
or e mail to pharter@calhouncountymi.gov