FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF REAL PROPERTY IN DIVORCE JUDGMENT IS WITHIN "DOMESTIC RELATIONS EXCEPTION" TO FEDERAL JURISDICTION  By Judge Faye M. Harrison

McLaughlin v. Cotner, Electronic citation: 1999 FED App. 0350P (6th Cir.) (No Date Given)

In 1993, Ms. McLaughlin and Mr. Cotner, formerly husband and wife, had entered into an agreement to sell residential real estate which they held as joint tenants.  This was part of a separation agreement, which was then incorporated into the divorce judgment. In 1997 Ms. McLaughlin filed a pro se complaint in the US District Court, alleging breach of the sale agreement.  Jurisdiction was predicated on diversity pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1332.  McLaughlin argued that this was a suit for breach of contract damages. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the US District Court had properly dismissed McLaughlin's complaint sua sponte and again reaffirmed the "domestic relations exception", noting that diversity jurisdiction does not exist for domestic relations cases involving divorce, alimony, and child custody matters.

Domestic Relations Review

Return to Calhoun County Courts Home Page


Last updated 12-17-99

Send your comments, questions and suggestions to Phil Harter at 161 E Michigan Avenue, Battle Creek, Michigan 49014
or e mail to pharter@calhouncountymi.gov